there are some difference between two group discussion. First point is their mind what should they do. The member of bad discussion want to tell opinion more than to understand others. But in good discussion, everyone try to understand others opinion. So talking people is always only one. which is very effective discussion style because all topic that discussed are understood by everyone(unless there are people who are so shy or who have no will to discuss). Second point is that leader's working. The leader of good discussion make the conclusion everyone agrees. It is because sometimes leader try to say the member's opinion in other words, that make topic easy to understand, and that develop the discuss smoothly!
By the way, I can't understand why both of discussion have the time to chat before leader tell everybody start. Is this exchanging opinion?
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿